This post is part of a series of articles about writing my novel, A Single Source of Truth.
Buy it here on Kindle or paperback.
Welcome to the first in a series of articles detailing the process I went through to get my novel, A Single Source of Truth, from the origin of an idea to a fully published eBook and paperback. Each post will be focused on a specific area, from writing and editing, through to cover design, manuscript formatting, and marketing. By the way, I am still learning in all of these fields and in no way consider myself an expert. This is just a recounting of my own experience and hopefully, someone will find it useful. For me, I hope it's a cathartic experience. Because let me tell you… writing this novel was a bastard.
Finding the Idea
Prior to writing A Single Source of Truth, I spent most of my creative time concentrating on screenplays. I'd grown up loving movies, made short films and wanted to be a full-time filmmaker, and so for a number of years, I penned a few feature-length screenplays and was looking for my next idea. This was in 2010. My novel was finished in 2019. Yep, it took me that long, but don't be disheartened if you're thinking about writing a book; my goalposts moved a fair bit over the years and the book wasn't my sole focus. I also did a number of things wrong, the flaws of which will hopefully be highlighted throughout this series.
Back to 2010. I was looking for my next idea and I vividly remember trying to concoct one for a short film. I wanted it shot all in one room, therefore be cheap to make. After struggling to come up with any worthwhile ideas, I went back to basics and considered the setup of classic crime novels – there's a dead body in a room and police have to solve it. A simple problem, one that I could picture in my head as a short film, but the solution to the crime would be the story, and I didn't have anything yet. But at least I had a problem to solve. And a problem is a starting point (something screenwriter Shane Black talks about in this amazing podcast I've listened to a dozen times). Any starting point is important when you're blanking on ideas. So that's what I had: dead body in a room. Check.
I wanted the story to be different though. I wanted to be clever (like I often do, probably linked to some sort of superiority complex). How could the classic murder mystery be turned on its head? It was with that question that answers started to unfold rather quickly.
*SPOILERS* THE NOVEL IS FREE TO READ HERE, WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR? *SPOILERS*
Initially, I wondered what if the dead body wasn't who the police thought it was? Unlikely, but I looked at all the evidence police would need in order to identify a body: teeth, fingerprints, DNA. Mulling over those details, I thought about the process of how those identifying features were forensically compared. How does a set of teeth found in a corpse actually get matched to the record of a human being? Where were the source materials stored? These days, with everything being digitised, I wondered whether the source data could be hacked and manipulated. That was when the main hook of the story clicked into place. A murder victim… positively identified by police in every way possible…. is actually someone else entirely!
I liked that idea. I was confident it hadn't been done before, which is usually one of my motivating factors in writing any story (a futile motivator, turns out), but it was definitely something I could make a short film about. The only problem was… the story got bigger. I struggle writing short-form stories at the best of times, but the more ideas I came up with regarding data manipulation, the more the story grew, and before long, I no longer considered it a 15 minute short, but a 2-hour movie!
Throughout the process of collecting ideas, the story went through many iterations. I had an idea set in the future where technology tracked everything. I also had one that took place entirely on the internet, ala the film Searching. Here are some samples of notes I made during months of brainstorming, this first one being the earliest from 2009.
In the modern day, technology is relied on so much, but it can also be manipulated. A man goes in search of the truth after something happens but he doesn't believe it. Perhaps he goes in search of a person who he thinks doesn't exist.
It's rather telling – reinforcing the idea that snap-judgments are more accurate than we think – that this first note is pretty much word-perfect for the finished novel. I didn't stop there, though:
Set in the future where crimes are faked. Photos, video footage etc can all be easily created in a computer. They're checked out by a division before they're promoted to an actual crime. One gets through and a cop has to solve a murder that he believes didn't actually take place.
Then in January 2010 (sorry if it's confusing):
A cop is told to investigate a murder, he gets to the scene of the crime and the body has gone, but clues are left behind. He does a bit of digging but needs more clues, he goes to the autopsy, its been done. They have DNA and find a match of a person. The cop goes through all the motions, interviewing family etc, it really pisses him off because he can't find anything on them. He has CCTV footage of the person in question walking home at night etc. He wants to see the body, he goes to get the body but its not there. He asks who did the autopsy, Phil according to the records, he goes to Phil, phil doesnt have any recollection. He goes back down the line, who was the cop at the scene of the crime? Who called it? no one did, even though it's logged in the system. Does this person even exist? He looks at the CCTV footage again. Is she fake? They get expert special effect guys in to analyse the video. It could be fake but it's damn good.
Is it actually a murderer covering up his murder of a girl by making her look like someone completely different? The cops would be tricked and stop looking for her, but she's actually a decoy of another REAL girl?
And in May 2010:
A murder. A database administrator knew her? works for police IT department. Starts to investigate the case himself, finds something out like the woman doesn't exist, tries to tell the cops but they're pretty busy and it's a closed case or they've nailed a guy for it, but the DB guy knows that's bullshit and digs deeper to find out that digital information has been manipulated to give this person an identity, including national records and CCTV footage. Perhaps police are behind this, covering up something.
As you can see, I didn't really know what I was writing, I was just piecing together loose ideas. I typically spend an inordinate amount of time brainstorming and ruminating, but I'm a firm believer that you can't rush creativity and it often comes to you when you're not even looking. The important thing is to just keep chiselling away. Dedicate thinking time. Go for walks. Remove distractions. Get bored! Boredom is a great source of creativity. Whatever ideas come to you, write them down. If you get your ideas down, you can review them in time and many will provide offshoots that lead you onto further ideas. That's how it starts for me.
In the next article, you'll see how I began building an outline of the story that eventually became A Single Source of Truth.
If you have any comments or questions, please post them in the box below.